2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2010 Chevrolet Optra
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Optra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2010 Chevrolet Optra. (120 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2010 Chevrolet Optra.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Chevrolet Optra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Chevrolet Optra. (166 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Chevrolet Optra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jeep Wrangler | 2010 Chevrolet Optra | |
| Make | Jeep | Chevrolet |
| Model | Wrangler | Optra |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 166 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2610 mm |
