2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2010 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2010 Ford Mustang is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2010 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Mustang (325 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jeep Wrangler | 2010 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Jeep | Ford |
| Model | Wrangler | Mustang |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3960 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 325 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4778 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1425 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2720 mm |
