2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2011 Audi A3
To start off, 2011 Audi A3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2011 Audi A3. (140 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2011 Audi A3.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Audi A3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi A3 (320 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2011 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 2011 Audi A3 | |
Make | Jeep | Audi |
Model | Wrangler | A3 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2578 mm |