2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2012 Renault Megane
To start off, 2012 Renault Megane is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2012 Renault Megane. (133 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Megane.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Megane. (191 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Megane. 2012 Renault Megane has automatic transmission and 2002 Jeep Wrangler has manual transmission. 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Renault Megane will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 2012 Renault Megane | |
Make | Jeep | Renault |
Model | Wrangler | Megane |
Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 191 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2530 mm |