2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2013 Audi A3
To start off, 2013 Audi A3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Audi A3 (197 HP) has 56 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2013 Audi A3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Audi A3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Audi A3. (281 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jeep Wrangler | 2013 Audi A3 | |
| Make | Jeep | Audi |
| Model | Wrangler | A3 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | W |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 197 HP |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 281 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4292 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1995 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1423 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2578 mm |
