2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL (423 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 282 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL (700 Nm) has 381 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Wrangler | SL |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 423 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 700 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 4-speed manual |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4612 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2099 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1315 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2585 mm |