2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2013 Scion tC
To start off, 2013 Scion tC is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Scion tC (178 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Scion tC should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2013 Scion tC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Scion tC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Scion tC. (235 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Scion tC.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 2013 Scion tC | |
Make | Jeep | Scion |
Model | Wrangler | tC |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 2494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 178 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 235 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1795 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1415 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2700 mm |