2002 Kia Optima vs. 1963 Seat 600

To start off, 2002 Kia Optima is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Kia Optima (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1963 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Kia Optima weights approximately 857 kg more than 1963 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Kia Optima (216 Nm) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Seat 600. (40 Nm). This means 2002 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Seat 600.

Compare all specifications: