2002 Kia Optima vs. 1978 Zastava 132

To start off, 2002 Kia Optima is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Kia Optima (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1978 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1978 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Kia Optima weights approximately 337 kg more than 1978 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1978 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Kia Optima (216 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Zastava 132. (142 Nm). This means 2002 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Zastava 132.

Compare all specifications: