2002 Kia Optima vs. 1980 Maserati Merak
To start off, 2002 Kia Optima is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Maserati Merak. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Maserati Merak would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Maserati Merak (157 HP @ 7100 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2002 Kia Optima. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Maserati Merak should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Optima. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Kia Optima weights approximately 76 kg more than 1980 Maserati Merak.
Because 1980 Maserati Merak is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Maserati Merak. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Kia Optima | 1980 Maserati Merak | |
| Make | Kia | Maserati |
| Model | Optima | Merak |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1980 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 157 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1432 kg | 1356 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2610 mm |
