2002 Kia Optima vs. 1986 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2002 Kia Optima is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Kia Optima (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1986 Mercury Lynx. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1986 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Kia Optima weights approximately 407 kg more than 1986 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Kia Optima (216 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mercury Lynx. (144 Nm). This means 2002 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Kia Optima | 1986 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Kia | Mercury |
Model | Optima | Lynx |
Year Released | 2002 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1859 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 144 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1432 kg | 1025 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2400 mm |