2002 Kia Optima vs. 1995 Mazda MX-3

To start off, 2002 Kia Optima is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Kia Optima (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1995 Mazda MX-3. (106 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda MX-3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Kia Optima weights approximately 373 kg more than 1995 Mazda MX-3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Kia Optima (216 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda MX-3. (134 Nm). This means 2002 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda MX-3.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Kia Optima 1995 Mazda MX-3
Make Kia Mazda
Model Optima MX-3
Year Released 2002 1995
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2497 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 138 HP 106 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6200 RPM
Torque 216 Nm 134 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1432 kg 1059 kg
Vehicle Length 4740 mm 4230 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2460 mm