2002 Kia Optima vs. 2004 Renault Scenic II
To start off, 2004 Renault Scenic II is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Kia Optima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Kia Optima would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Renault Scenic II (162 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2002 Kia Optima. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Renault Scenic II should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Optima. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Kia Optima weights approximately 7 kg more than 2004 Renault Scenic II.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Renault Scenic II (271 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Kia Optima. (216 Nm). This means 2004 Renault Scenic II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Kia Optima.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Kia Optima | 2004 Renault Scenic II | |
Make | Kia | Renault |
Model | Optima | Scenic II |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 271 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1432 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2690 mm |