2002 Kia Optima vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Kia Optima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Kia Optima would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Kia Optima (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Kia Optima weights approximately 267 kg more than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Kia Optima (216 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (195 Nm). This means 2002 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Kia Optima 2005 Volkswagen Polo
Make Kia Volkswagen
Model Optima Polo
Year Released 2002 2005
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2497 cc 1422 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 138 HP 74 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 216 Nm 195 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1432 kg 1165 kg
Vehicle Length 4740 mm 3900 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2520 mm