2002 Kia Optima vs. 2007 Mazda CX-9

To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Kia Optima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Kia Optima would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 2002 Kia Optima. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Optima.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (338 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Kia Optima. (216 Nm). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Kia Optima. 2007 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 2002 Kia Optima has manual transmission. 2002 Kia Optima will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Kia Optima 2007 Mazda CX-9
Make Kia Mazda
Model Optima CX-9
Year Released 2002 2007
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2497 cc 3496 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 138 HP 263 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6250 RPM
Torque 216 Nm 338 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4740 mm 5080 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1940 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1740 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2880 mm