2002 Kia Optima vs. 2010 Nissan Murano

To start off, 2010 Nissan Murano is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Kia Optima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Kia Optima would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Murano (265 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 2002 Kia Optima. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Optima. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Murano weights approximately 374 kg more than 2002 Kia Optima. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Murano (336 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Kia Optima. (216 Nm). This means 2010 Nissan Murano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Kia Optima.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Kia Optima 2010 Nissan Murano
Make Kia Nissan
Model Optima Murano
Year Released 2002 2010
Body Type Sedan Crossover
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2497 cc 3500 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 138 HP 265 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 216 Nm 336 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual CVT
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1432 kg 1806 kg
Vehicle Length 4740 mm 4788 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1882 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1730 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2824 mm