2002 Kia Optima vs. 2011 Ford E-250

To start off, 2011 Ford E-250 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Kia Optima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Kia Optima would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2002 Kia Optima. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Optima. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford E-250 weights approximately 978 kg more than 2002 Kia Optima. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2011 Ford E-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Ford E-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford E-250 (387 Nm) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Kia Optima. (216 Nm). This means 2011 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Kia Optima. 2011 Ford E-250 has automatic transmission and 2002 Kia Optima has manual transmission. 2002 Kia Optima will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Ford E-250 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: