2002 Kia Pregio vs. 1964 Rover P5
To start off, 2002 Kia Pregio is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Rover P5 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Rover P5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Rover P5 (119 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2002 Kia Pregio. (93 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Rover P5 should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Pregio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Rover P5 weights approximately 40 kg more than 2002 Kia Pregio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Rover P5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Rover P5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Kia Pregio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Kia Pregio | 1964 Rover P5 | |
Make | Kia | Rover |
Model | Pregio | P5 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2476 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2820 mm |