2002 Kia Pregio vs. 1967 Triumph 1300
To start off, 2002 Kia Pregio is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Triumph 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Triumph 1300 would be higher. At 2,476 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Kia Pregio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Kia Pregio (93 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1967 Triumph 1300. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Kia Pregio should accelerate faster than 1967 Triumph 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Kia Pregio weights approximately 762 kg more than 1967 Triumph 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Kia Pregio | 1967 Triumph 1300 | |
| Make | Kia | Triumph |
| Model | Pregio | 1300 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Van | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2476 cc | 1296 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 918 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2460 mm |
