2002 Kia Pride Wagon vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Kia Pride Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Kia Pride Wagon would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 85 more horse power than 2002 Kia Pride Wagon. (63 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Pride Wagon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Kia Pride Wagon. (136 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Kia Pride Wagon. 2010 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 2002 Kia Pride Wagon has manual transmission. 2002 Kia Pride Wagon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Kia Pride Wagon | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Kia | Holden |
Model | Pride Wagon | Epica |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1324 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2700 mm |