2002 Kia Retona vs. 1951 Maserati A6G
To start off, 2002 Kia Retona is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Kia Retona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Maserati A6G (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2002 Kia Retona. (90 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Retona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Kia Retona weights approximately 1322 kg more than 1951 Maserati A6G.
Because 2002 Kia Retona is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Maserati A6G. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Kia Retona will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Kia Retona | 1951 Maserati A6G | |
| Make | Kia | Maserati |
| Model | Retona | A6G |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1872 kg | 550 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2290 mm |
