2002 Kia Retona vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2002 Kia Retona is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Kia Retona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Kia Retona (90 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Kia Retona should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Kia Retona weights approximately 1372 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Kia Retona (205 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2002 Kia Retona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Kia Retona | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Kia | Suzuki |
| Model | Retona | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 358 cc |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 205 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1872 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2060 mm |
