2002 Kia Retona vs. 1973 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2002 Kia Retona is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Triumph 2000 would be higher. Both 2002 Kia Retona and 1973 Triumph 2000 are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Kia Retona (90 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1973 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Kia Retona should accelerate faster than 1973 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Kia Retona weights approximately 624 kg more than 1973 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Kia Retona (205 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2002 Kia Retona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Kia Retona | 1973 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Kia | Triumph |
| Model | Retona | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 205 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1872 kg | 1248 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2700 mm |
