2002 Kia Retona vs. 1974 Mazda 616
To start off, 2002 Kia Retona is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Kia Retona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Kia Retona (90 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1974 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Kia Retona should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Kia Retona weights approximately 960 kg more than 1974 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Kia Retona (205 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Kia Retona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Kia Retona | 1974 Mazda 616 | |
| Make | Kia | Mazda |
| Model | Retona | 616 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1974 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 205 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 83 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1872 kg | 912 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2480 mm |
