2002 Kia Retona vs. 1997 Mercury Villager
To start off, 2002 Kia Retona is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2002 Kia Retona. (90 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Retona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Kia Retona weights approximately 72 kg more than 1997 Mercury Villager.
Because 2002 Kia Retona is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Mercury Villager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Kia Retona will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Kia Retona | 1997 Mercury Villager | |
Make | Kia | Mercury |
Model | Retona | Villager |
Year Released | 2002 | 1997 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1872 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2860 mm |