2002 Kia Retona vs. 2012 Ford S-Max
To start off, 2012 Ford S-Max is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Kia Retona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Kia Retona would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Kia Retona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford S-Max (160 HP) has 70 more horse power than 2002 Kia Retona. (90 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford S-Max should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Retona.
Because 2002 Kia Retona is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford S-Max. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Kia Retona will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Ford S-Max has automatic transmission and 2002 Kia Retona has manual transmission. 2002 Kia Retona will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Ford S-Max will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Kia Retona | 2012 Ford S-Max | |
| Make | Kia | Ford |
| Model | Retona | S-Max |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 160 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
