2002 Kia Rio vs. 1956 Saab 93
To start off, 2002 Kia Rio is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Saab 93. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Saab 93 would be higher. At 1,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Kia Rio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Kia Rio (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1956 Saab 93. (33 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Kia Rio should accelerate faster than 1956 Saab 93. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Kia Rio weights approximately 210 kg more than 1956 Saab 93. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Kia Rio (113 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Saab 93. (68 Nm). This means 2002 Kia Rio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Saab 93.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Kia Rio | 1956 Saab 93 | |
Make | Kia | Saab |
Model | Rio | 93 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1343 cc | 748 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 113 Nm | 68 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 71.6 mm | 66 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.3 mm | 72.9 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2500 mm |