2002 Kia Rio vs. 1963 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 2002 Kia Rio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 2,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Plymouth Valiant (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2002 Kia Rio. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Plymouth Valiant should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Rio.
Because 1963 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Kia Rio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Kia Rio | 1963 Plymouth Valiant | |
| Make | Kia | Plymouth |
| Model | Rio | Valiant |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1343 cc | 2789 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2700 mm |
