2002 Kia Rio vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2002 Kia Rio is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Kia Rio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Kia Rio weights approximately 445 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Because 1965 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Kia Rio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Kia Rio (113 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm). This means 2002 Kia Rio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Kia Rio | 1965 Seat 600 | |
Make | Kia | Seat |
Model | Rio | 600 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1343 cc | 767 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 113 Nm | 47 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2010 mm |