2002 Kia Rio vs. 1966 Mini MK I
To start off, 2002 Kia Rio is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Kia Rio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Kia Rio (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1966 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Kia Rio should accelerate faster than 1966 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Kia Rio weights approximately 405 kg more than 1966 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Kia Rio (113 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Mini MK I. (61 Nm). This means 2002 Kia Rio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Kia Rio | 1966 Mini MK I | |
| Make | Kia | Mini |
| Model | Rio | MK I |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1343 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 113 Nm | 61 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 615 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2040 mm |
