2002 Kia Rio vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 2002 Kia Rio is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Kia Rio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Kia Rio (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Kia Rio should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66.
Because 1976 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Kia Rio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Kia Rio (113 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 2002 Kia Rio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Kia Rio | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Kia | Volvo |
| Model | Rio | 66 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1343 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 113 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 71.6 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.3 mm | 77 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 3910 mm |
