2002 Kia Rio vs. 1978 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2002 Kia Rio is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,290 cc, 1978 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2002 Kia Rio. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Rio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Kia Rio weights approximately 60 kg more than 1978 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1978 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Kia Rio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Kia Rio. (113 Nm). This means 1978 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Kia Rio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Kia Rio | 1978 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Kia | Mazda |
| Model | Rio | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1343 cc | 2290 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 113 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2480 mm |
