2002 Kia Rio vs. 1979 Lancia Beta
To start off, 2002 Kia Rio is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 1,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Kia Rio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Lancia Beta (81 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2002 Kia Rio. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Lancia Beta should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Rio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Kia Rio weights approximately 20 kg more than 1979 Lancia Beta.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Kia Rio (113 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Lancia Beta. (108 Nm). This means 2002 Kia Rio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Lancia Beta.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Kia Rio | 1979 Lancia Beta | |
| Make | Kia | Lancia |
| Model | Rio | Beta |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1343 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 113 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 71.6 mm | 70.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.3 mm | 78.8 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2360 mm |
