2002 Kia Rio vs. 1980 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2002 Kia Rio is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mercury Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Kia Rio (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1980 Mercury Lynx. (70 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Kia Rio should accelerate faster than 1980 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Kia Rio weights approximately 70 kg more than 1980 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Mercury Lynx (121 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Kia Rio. (113 Nm). This means 1980 Mercury Lynx will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Kia Rio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Kia Rio | 1980 Mercury Lynx | |
| Make | Kia | Mercury |
| Model | Rio | Lynx |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1343 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 113 Nm | 121 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 71.6 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.3 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2400 mm |
