2002 Kia Rio vs. 1983 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2002 Kia Rio is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mercury Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Kia Rio (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Kia Rio should accelerate faster than 1983 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mercury Lynx weights approximately 30 kg more than 2002 Kia Rio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Kia Rio (113 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (111 Nm). This means 2002 Kia Rio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Kia Rio | 1983 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Kia | Mercury |
Model | Rio | Lynx |
Year Released | 2002 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1343 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 113 Nm | 111 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2400 mm |