2002 Kia Rio vs. 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2002 Kia Rio is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass (163 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2002 Kia Rio. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Rio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 180 kg more than 2002 Kia Rio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass (237 Nm) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Kia Rio. (113 Nm). This means 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Kia Rio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Kia Rio | 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Kia | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Rio | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1343 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 113 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2640 mm |
