2002 Kia Rio vs. 1991 Nissan Pulsar

To start off, 2002 Kia Rio is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Nissan Pulsar (141 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2002 Kia Rio. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Rio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 130 kg more than 2002 Kia Rio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Nissan Pulsar (179 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Kia Rio. (113 Nm). This means 1991 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Kia Rio. 1991 Nissan Pulsar has automatic transmission and 2002 Kia Rio has manual transmission. 2002 Kia Rio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1991 Nissan Pulsar will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: