2002 Kia Rio vs. 1993 Mercury Cougar

To start off, 2002 Kia Rio is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1993 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mercury Cougar (202 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 2002 Kia Rio. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Rio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 670 kg more than 2002 Kia Rio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1993 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Kia Rio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Mercury Cougar (359 Nm) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Kia Rio. (113 Nm). This means 1993 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Kia Rio.

Compare all specifications: