2002 Kia Rio vs. 1996 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2002 Kia Rio is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lotus Elan (163 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2002 Kia Rio. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Rio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Lotus Elan (204 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Kia Rio. (113 Nm). This means 1996 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Kia Rio.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Kia Rio | 1996 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Kia | Lotus |
Model | Rio | Elan |
Year Released | 2002 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1343 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 113 Nm | 204 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2260 mm |