2002 Kia Rio vs. 2004 MG ZT
To start off, 2004 MG ZT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Kia Rio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Kia Rio would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MG ZT (158 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2002 Kia Rio. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Rio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 MG ZT weights approximately 465 kg more than 2002 Kia Rio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 MG ZT (215 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Kia Rio. (113 Nm). This means 2004 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Kia Rio.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Kia Rio | 2004 MG ZT | |
Make | Kia | MG |
Model | Rio | ZT |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1343 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 113 Nm | 215 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2760 mm |