2002 Kia Rio vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Kia Rio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Kia Rio would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL weights approximately 1115 kg more than 2002 Kia Rio.
Because 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Kia Rio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL (900 Nm) has 787 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Kia Rio. (113 Nm). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Kia Rio.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Kia Rio | 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL | |
Make | Kia | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Rio | CL |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1343 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 113 Nm | 900 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 71.6 mm | 98 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.3 mm | 90 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 2135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 5106 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1426 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2955 mm |