2002 Kia Shuma vs. 2009 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2009 Lotus Evora is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Kia Shuma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Kia Shuma would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Lotus Evora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 2002 Kia Shuma. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Shuma.
Because 2009 Lotus Evora is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Lotus Evora. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Kia Shuma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lotus Evora (342 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Kia Shuma. (144 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Kia Shuma.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Kia Shuma | 2009 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Kia | Lotus |
Model | Shuma | Evora |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 342 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2580 mm |