2002 Kia Shuma vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Kia Shuma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Kia Shuma would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 257 more horse power than 2002 Kia Shuma. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Shuma.
Because 2010 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Kia Shuma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 386 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Kia Shuma. (144 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Kia Shuma.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Kia Shuma | 2010 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Kia | Holden |
| Model | Shuma | UTE |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1594 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
