2002 Kia Shuma vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Kia Shuma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Kia Shuma would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Megane (112 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2002 Kia Shuma. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Shuma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Megane (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Kia Shuma. (144 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Kia Shuma.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Kia Shuma | 2010 Renault Megane | |
Make | Kia | Renault |
Model | Shuma | Megane |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |