2002 Kia Shuma vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Kia Shuma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Kia Shuma would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Cooper weights approximately 95 kg more than 2002 Kia Shuma.
Because 2013 Mini Cooper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Mini Cooper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Kia Shuma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Cooper (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Kia Shuma. (144 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Cooper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Kia Shuma.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Kia Shuma | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Kia | Mini |
Model | Shuma | Cooper |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3723 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1407 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 50 L |