2002 Kia Visto vs. 1994 Rover 200
To start off, 2002 Kia Visto is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Rover 200 (198 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 2002 Kia Visto. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Visto. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover 200 weights approximately 385 kg more than 2002 Kia Visto. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Rover 200 (237 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Kia Visto. (73 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1994 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Kia Visto.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Kia Visto | 1994 Rover 200 | |
Make | Kia | Rover |
Model | Visto | 200 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 73 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1410 mm |