2002 Lada 110 vs. 1967 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2002 Lada 110 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2002 Lada 110. (70 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 2002 Lada 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 150 kg more than 2002 Lada 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lada 110. (115 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1967 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lada 110.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Lada 110 | 1967 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Lada | Triumph |
Model | 110 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 64 L |