2002 Lada 117 vs. 2008 MG ZT
To start off, 2008 MG ZT is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lada 117. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lada 117 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 MG ZT (134 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2002 Lada 117. (77 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 2002 Lada 117. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 MG ZT weights approximately 525 kg more than 2002 Lada 117. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 MG ZT (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lada 117. (133 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2008 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lada 117.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Lada 117 | 2008 MG ZT | |
| Make | Lada | MG |
| Model | 117 | ZT |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 77 HP | 134 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1625 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 65 L |
