2002 Lada 119 vs. 1994 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2002 Lada 119 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Lada 119 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lada 119 (76 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1994 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lada 119 should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Lada 119 weights approximately 84 kg more than 1994 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lada 119 (129 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Lada 119 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Lada 119 | 1994 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Lada | Mazda |
| Model | 119 | Midge |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1323 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 129 Nm | 101 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1400 mm |
