2002 Lada 119 vs. 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa
To start off, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lada 119. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lada 119 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2002 Lada 119. (76 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa should accelerate faster than 2002 Lada 119.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lada 119. (129 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lada 119. 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa has automatic transmission and 2002 Lada 119 has manual transmission. 2002 Lada 119 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Lada 119 | 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | 119 | MX-Flexa |
Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 129 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2760 mm |